|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Quid Pro Quo
• by writer/director Carlos Brooks
Yes, these people really do exist. That’s the answer to the
question I am most often asked after a screening of my film, Quid
Pro Quo, a new detective movie (actually a sub-genre known as the investigative
journalism thriller)—and at least part of what makes it a mystery
lies in the answer to that question: “Are there really able-bodied
people out there who want to be disabled?”
To be honest, I almost didn’t write this one. I’m not interested
in weirdness for its own sake. And I don’t get much of a hit
off poking at cultural taboos. I also had to question the relevance
of a story that concerned a group of disability “wannabes”—was
there ever a subject matter related to a smaller group of people? I
hope not.
But a satisfying detective story is hard to come by—and this,
I felt pretty safe in assuming, was one nobody had ever done before.
But the reason I made this film despite my misgivings is because while
it dealt with a very specific pathology, I realized there was an element
to it that was also universal. That is, haven’t we all—whether
as individuals, groups, or even as a nation—at one time or another,
found comfort in the idea of ourselves as victims?
It is as seductive an idea as it is unexamined, this impulse to claim
injury. We imagine the victim’s status relieves us of responsibility,
while still entitling us to compensation. It’s an impulse to
be significant, to require the attention of others. The more I thought
about it, I began to realize these impulses were the stuff of classic
pulp fiction. Stories from magazines like Black
Mask, whose editors
labored to keep the attention of their readership—white sex slave
debutantes one week were saved by crab-walking detectives the next—and
here I had stumbled onto something even they had not conjured. And
it was rooted in reality.
I don’t remember discussing the theme of “victimhood” during
rehearsals—too laden. Instead, I said the film is about one idea:
you are what you believe. I also told the actors to think of the entire
story as taking place in that moment between deep sleep and wakefulness.
By telling the story from that perspective, I think I hoped it would
clarify our intention in examining these uncomfortable questions and
feelings, which I felt should not be to provoke or disturb at all—but
to awaken.
|
|
| |
|
|
|