The memories I have of Bruce Nugent are elusive at best. Throughout
the past seven months of screening my feature film Brother
To Brother on the festival circuit, I have been constantly asked
what the inspiration for the film was. Most of all it seems like it
was this strange intersection of my life with his and a profound love
I developed for him even though we’d never met and he passed away
in 1987 when I was sixteen years old.
In 1987, when Bruce was probably at his weakest, I was browsing through
an aisle at the St. Mark’s Bookstore. I pulled a book from the
shelf entitled In The Life, opening to an essay that caught
my attention—“Bruce Nugent: Bohemian of the Harlem Renaissance.”
As I finished reading those pages and placed the book back on the shelf
I remember thinking to myself, “This guy’s really interesting.
I need to come back to him.”
Roger Robinson, the actor who plays Bruce Nugent in his elderly years,
describes a deep sense of loss that seemed integral to who Bruce was
towards the end of his life. As we both did our research to bring him
to life on screen, it was this sense of loss that we both seemed to
connect with. If we were both going to do justice to his story we were
going to have to delve deeply into this feeling we got from him.
The more I learned about Bruce in my two years of writing and research,
the more I knew the structure and form of the film would have to mirror
the complex and poetic nature of his mind. There were many forms of
knowledge that he seemed to synthesize—moving from the bars of
New York’s Lower East Side where he seduced straight Italian gangsters,
to the hotels of high society Washington where he passed for white,
to the anthropology classes of Franz Boas that he attended during the
1920s at Columbia University, to the scandalous gay rent parties during
the Harlem Renaissance. Bruce saw the ways that the street corner philosopher
and the academic scholar had so much to gain by listening to each other.
He was open-minded enough to find the connections between these disparate
realms.
Thus, the content and form of Brother To Brother
needed to encompass the exploratory nature of Nugent’s
life and worldview. The various narrative strands would need to somehow
coalesce into a meaningful and unified whole. Nugent’s mind seemed
to take him into fantastical worlds and the film would have to do the
same for the audience. The standard cradle to grave biopic would not
suffice. It had to be something that was as unique and idiosyncratic
as Nugent and yet also integrate the burgeoning love that I felt for
him as I delved deeper into his life, a love that moved outside of the
normal logic of space and time. Thus, the younger fictional character
of Perry came into being and the emotional heart of the film would be
the evolving love between these two characters. Some of my personal
experiences would be used as the launching pad into imagining Perry’s
contemporary world. The present-day narrative would then subtly parallel
Bruce’s youthful experiences during his coming-of-age during the
Harlem Renaissance. These parallels needed to evoke the feelings I had
as I learned more and more about Bruce’s life and began to think
of him as my doppelganger—someone who had similar thoughts as
he walked the same New York City streets generations before me.
The more I learned about Bruce Nugent in making Brother
To Brother, the more I knew there would always be aspects of
his life that were unknowable. Yet my curiosity about him kept the momentum
going for the six long years it took to complete the film. As the last
frame flickers in projectors across the country this fall, it is my
hope that audiences will leave the theatre with that same feeling of
wanting to know more.